Information Roundup: California to problem Supreme Courtroom absurdity; press yawns at new coup proof


The proposed California regulation would privatize “bounty looking” lawsuits towards assault rifle purchasers as a result of the Supreme Courtroom says you possibly can violate no matter constitutional guidelines you need as long as you have deputized personal residents into doing the violating.

Within the information right now: Responding to the clear absurdity of the Supreme Courtroom’s stance on the Texas “bounty hunter”-premised state ban on abortions, California Gov. Gavin Newsom introduced he is calling the court docket’s bluff, pushing for the same bounty-hunter invoice that enables any Californian to sue those that manufacture, promote, or personal assault rifles within the state. How will court docket conservatives justify their backing of 1 however not the opposite?

Useful tip: They will not strive. The Supreme Courtroom’s hard-right contingent has reliably landed on hard-right selections even when their new reasoning blatantly contradicts their proclamations of only some selections again; this has produced reasoning so wildly inconsistent, from case to case, that colleagues and court docket watchers alike have made a sport of calling it out. (Additionally three of the justices allied with a global extortionist and nationwide traitor so as to get their robes, so let’s not faux there are any deep ideas available right here to start with.)

On the nation’s entrance pages, new information of PowerPoint paperwork circulating broadly in Trump’s internal circle describing the steps they might take to topple our authorities and erase an election went largely unmentioned. Conferences contained in the White Home on the best way to erase our constitutional authorities simply do not have the dazzle of scoops on correct electronic mail dealing with protocols, little question.

Here is a few of what you might have missed: