Do you want to fear about fluoride throughout being pregnant?

0
55

A landmark examine by Grandjean, et al.,1 has been revealed confirming that very low ranges of fluoride publicity throughout being pregnant impair the mind improvement of the kid and at a inhabitants stage could also be inflicting extra harm than lead, mercury or arsenic.

The examine discovered {that a} maternal urine fluoride focus of 0.2 mg/L, which is exceeded 4 to 5 occasions in pregnant ladies dwelling in fluoridated communities, was sufficient to decrease IQ by one level. The authors said that even this influence is probably going underestimated and:

“These findings present extra proof that fluoride is a developmental neurotoxicant … and the benchmark outcomes ought to encourage a revision of water-fluoride suggestions aimed toward defending pregnant ladies and younger kids.”

A urinary fluoride (UF) focus of 0.2 mg/L is much beneath what a pregnant lady in a fluoridated group would have, as confirmed by two latest research.

A examine of pregnant ladies in fluoridated San Francisco, California,2 discovered a imply UF focus of 0.74 mg/L, and one with individuals in fluoridated communities throughout Canada3 discovered a imply UF focus of 1.06 mg/L. Each ranges had been considerably larger than these present in ladies in nonfluoridated communities.

Grandjean, et al.’s examine, revealed in Threat Evaluation, was a benchmark dose (BMD) evaluation of the pooled information from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH) funded ELEMENT and MIREC delivery cohorts in Mexico and Canada. These are the delivery cohorts that had been used within the research that discovered publicity to low ranges of fluoride throughout being pregnant is linked to cognitive impairment in kids.4,5,6,7

A Benchmark Dose is used to determine a dose or focus that will seemingly trigger an outlined quantity of hurt, on this case a lack of one IQ level.

What makes this paper so vital is that BMD is a part of the U.S. Environmental Safety Company’s (EPA) danger evaluation methodology, and the paper’s authors used a one IQ level drop because the antagonistic impact quantity as a result of the EPA has used this identical stage of IQ loss in their very own danger assessments and has beneficial use of such a stage.

It has been effectively established {that a} lack of one IQ level results in a decreased lifetime incomes potential of $18,000. Summed over the entire inhabitants we’re speaking a couple of lack of billions of {dollars} of incomes potential every year.

It’s estimated that over 72% of public ingesting water techniques in America are fluoridated; thus, hundreds of thousands of pregnant ladies are at the moment being uncovered to ranges of fluoride which have the potential to decrease their kids’s IQ by a minimum of 4 factors and doubtless extra.

Furthermore, it’s vital to level out that in danger assessments utilizing BMD methodology, it’s normal observe to use a security issue on prime of the calculated BMD with a purpose to decide a protected reference dose (RfD) to guard the entire inhabitants (together with essentially the most weak) from hurt.

If that security issue used was the usual security margin of 10, to account for the variables in population-wide sensitivity, then the EPA may conclude that any urine fluoride focus above 0.02 mg/L can be unacceptable and “unsafe.” That is 35 occasions decrease than what the American Dental Affiliation and Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention suggest for fluoridated communities.

Examine Submitted to Decide in Federal Fluoridation Lawsuit

Michael Connett, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs within the lawsuit towards the EPA, has despatched a duplicate8 of this BMD evaluation to the decide presiding over the case at the moment in federal courtroom. The Fluoride Motion Community is concerned in an ongoing federal lawsuit9 towards the EPA looking for to ban the deliberate addition of fluoride to ingesting water due to its neurotoxicity.

A trial was held in June 2020, which featured world-renowned specialists10 testifying in courtroom that fluoridation posed a hazard on par with lead. On the conclusion, the decide said that we had offered “critical proof” that presents “critical questions” in regards to the security of fluoridation, and mentioned, “I don’t suppose anybody disputes that fluoride is a hazard.”

The decide additionally famous that the EPA had used an incorrect normal for assessing the obtainable science and provided them a second likelihood to assessment it precisely, which they’ve declined repeatedly.

Since final summer time, we’ve additionally received a number of authorized victories, together with rulings towards EPA motions to dismiss the case and a latest ruling in April 2021 granting our movement to amend our authentic 2016 petition to incorporate the most recent research and a extra detailed itemizing of plaintiffs.

Within the written order,11 the courtroom dismantles the EPA’s arguments one after the other, displaying that the decide is dedicated to making sure that the entire science is taken into account and stays the main target, which is an excellent signal for our facet.

The ruling additionally units a precedent for future environmental circumstances beneath the Poisonous Substances Management Act (TSCA) by permitting petitioners to replace and amend complaints to incorporate essentially the most up-to-date science in the course of the trial, slightly then restart the multiyear petition course of over because the EPA attorneys needed.

The courtroom will maintain the trial in abeyance till the ultimate Nationwide Toxicology Program monograph on fluoride’s neurotoxicity is revealed presumably later this yr. The decide was additionally awaiting the discharge of the benchmark dose evaluation talked about above and a minimum of one extra examine due out later in 2021.

As soon as all of this new analysis is obtainable to the courtroom, the decide might probably maintain a second section of the trial, permitting extra discovery and testimony solely on this new proof. In truth, in the course of the April 22, 2021, standing listening to, the decide mentioned this was his choice, and within the courtroom order it’s written, “As this Court docket has indicated, the evolving science warrants reopening of skilled discovery and trial proof.”

The courtroom order indicated that after the decide has had the chance to see the brand new proof and listen to from each side, the Fluoride Motion Community will be capable of resubmit our amended petition to the EPA for what’s going to seemingly be one final alternative for his or her reconsideration earlier than a ultimate ruling is made by the decide.

The subsequent courtroom listening to might be August 26, 2021, at 10:30 a.m. (Pacific U.S.). To get extra updates and hyperlinks to view the listening to, comply with FAN on Facebook and Twitter or join our weekly bulletin.

For these desirous to compensate for this precedent setting trial, we’ve a number of sources obtainable for you. First is a 16-minute video that includes our lawyer, Michael Connett, offering an in depth background on the case and trial. Second, we’ve a 30-minute interview of Connett by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Third, FAN has a complete database of paperwork, timelines, media protection and supplies in regards to the lawsuit on our website.

fluoride awareness week

>>>>> Click Here <<<<<

Damning Deposition Movies

The speaking level we most likely hear essentially the most from proponents at council hearings, and repeated by coverage makers, is that authorities businesses just like the CDC and EPA vouch for fluoridation’s security and effectiveness, and regulate the observe responsibly, so subsequently it have to be true and we have to be incorrect.

As a substitute of verifying any of those claims, coverage makers have put their blind belief in these businesses. The media shops, however, which ought to be the nation’s watchdog, have suspended their professionalism by not solely blindly trusting these businesses, but additionally by discrediting these against fluoridation.

Below oath, representatives from these businesses proved that their mantra of “protected and efficient” is just a baseless declare used to advertise a failed coverage. On this first video, Casey Hannan, the director of the CDC’s Oral Well being Division, testifies that the CDC has no information12 establishing the security of fluoride’s impact on the mind, regardless of a long time of touting the security of fluoridation for all residents, together with kids.

On this second video, Hannan admits there is no such thing as a prenatal or early-life profit13 from fluoride regardless of its identified neurotoxicity to this identical sub-population. Within the third video, Joyce Donohue, Ph.D., a scientist from the EPA’s Workplace of Water, admits that the EPA’s present fluoride danger evaluation, and thus fluoridation rules, are old-fashioned and ought to be up to date14 in response to the gathering of research displaying neurotoxicity revealed over the previous a number of years.

These three movies are only a small style of what was admitted beneath oath by representatives of the federal government businesses accountable for defending the well being of People.

For instance, in the course of the trial we additionally watched a video of CDC’s Hannan agreeing with the discovering that “fluorides additionally enhance the manufacturing of free radicals within the mind … and enhance danger of Alzheimer’s illness,” in addition to agreeing with the Nationwide Analysis Council discovering that “it’s obvious that fluorides have the power to intervene with the perform of the mind and physique by direct and oblique means.”

FAN will be capable of share rather more of this video content material with you after a ruling is made within the trial, exposing the failure of those businesses to guard the general public from overexposure to fluoride.

Former NTP Director Warns Mother and father in Op-Ed

Together with the avalanche of latest peer-reviewed research displaying hurt and the lawsuit exposing authorities negligence, there was an ever-growing refrain of warnings to the general public and opposition to fluoridation from researchers and public well being specialists. This contains the previous director of each the Nationwide Institute of Environmental Well being Sciences and the Nationwide Toxicology Program of the Nationwide Institutes of Well being.

Toxicologist and microbiologist Linda Birnbaum, Ph.D., co-authored an op-ed showing in Environmental Well being Information with Christine Until, Ph.D., an affiliate professor of psychology at York College in Toronto, Canada, and Dr. Bruce Lanphear, MPH, a doctor, medical scientist and professor at Simon Fraser College in Vancouver, Canada.

Until is a co-author of a number of important fluoride research together with the JAMA Pediatrics fluoride neurotoxicity examine15 and others discovering lowered IQ, elevated prognosis of ADHD and thyroid impairment. She obtained a management award from York College, partly, for this groundbreaking analysis.

Lanphear can be an award-winning researcher who has been a member of two Nationwide Academies of Science committees, is a member of the EPA’s Lead Overview Panel and is famend for his analysis on low-level lead publicity and plenty of different environmental neurotoxins.

The op-ed, titled “It Is Time to Shield Youngsters’ Growing Brains From Fluoride,”16 highlights the mounting proof that fluoride is impairing mind improvement and compares the response from the general public well being group to its delayed response to the plain hurt attributable to lead. The authors name for the U.S. “to rethink this publicity for pregnant ladies and kids,” and state:

“Given the burden of proof that fluoride is poisonous to the growing mind, it’s time for well being organizations and regulatory our bodies to assessment their suggestions and rules to make sure they defend pregnant ladies and their kids … We will act now by recommending that pregnant ladies and infants scale back their fluoride consumption.”

The op-ed is accompanied by a strong animated brief video17 on the influence of fluoride on mind improvement produced by Little Issues Matter, a nonprofit scientific group composed of kids’s environmental well being professionals. Dr. Until was additionally lately filmed giving an hour-long “should watch” presentation and Q&A on her fluoride neurotoxicity analysis.18

FAN has compiled quotes19 (and produced a video) from a wide range of specialists warning about fluoride’s neurotoxicity, in addition to a listing of opinion items and journal articles20 warning of hurt.

From Womb to Tomb

An April 2021 examine from Sweden discovered 50% larger charges of hip bone fractures in post-menopausal ladies in an space with as much as about 1 mg/L fluoride in ingesting water.21 It additionally discovered 10% to twenty% larger charges of fractures for all sorts of bone fractures and for these sorts generally related to osteoporosis.

The high-quality cohort examine used detailed info from greater than 4,000 older Swedish ladies enrolled beginning in 2004 and adopted by 2017. Their largest supply of publicity was from naturally occurring fluoride in ingesting water, at concentrations at or beneath 1 mg/L. Their whole exposures fell inside the identical vary as ladies dwelling in areas with synthetic fluoridation.

Concern for fluoride’s impact on bone high quality was raised 25 years in the past primarily based on animal research: “[O]ne can not assist however be alarmed by the unfavourable results of fluoride on bone power persistently demonstrated in animal fashions.”22,23 The animal findings prompted human research. This new Swedish examine builds on earlier research that discovered elevated danger of bone fractures in older folks with long-term fluoride publicity.24,25,26

It’s also in keeping with intensive expertise from randomized managed trials (RCT) completed within the Nineteen Nineties that tried to lower fracture danger for these with osteoporosis by giving sufferers comparatively excessive doses of fluoride.

As a substitute of reducing fracture danger, these research discovered elevated danger, particularly for hip fractures, and the makes an attempt to make use of fluoride as a medicine towards osteoporosis have been largely deserted. Researchers concluded that though fluoride can enhance bone mineral density (BMD), it concurrently decreases bone high quality and bone power, regardless of the higher density.

This should have critical implications for the observe of fluoridation. The examine’s findings counsel that long-term consumption of fluoridated water could also be accountable for 50% or extra of the hip fractures skilled by older folks. There are about 2 million osteoporotic fractures within the U.S. per yr, of which about 300,000 are hip fractures.27 Hip fractures within the aged are a number one reason for incapacity and loss of life.

“About 30% of individuals with a hip fracture will die within the following yr.”28 “Of those that survive, many don’t regain their prefracture stage of perform. About 50% of sufferers with hip fractures won’t ever be capable of ambulate with out help and 25% would require long-term care.”29

Water fluoridation could actually be killing older folks, taking years off their lives or leaving them confined to wheelchairs. “Treating hip fractures can be very costly. A typical affected person with a hip fracture spends US $40,000 within the first yr following hip fracture for direct medical prices and virtually $5,000 in subsequent years.”30

Widespread fluoridation within the U.S. may assist clarify why, “Hip fracture charges among the many U.S. inhabitants are the very best on the earth.”31 Simply as with the fluoride neurotoxicity research which might be lastly being taken significantly, and funded by authorities businesses, this new examine might assist spur extra high-quality research on bone results of fluoride.

However there may be already greater than sufficient proof of danger to the mind, and now to bone well being, that there is no such thing as a justification to proceed deliberately including fluoride to ingesting water for the only real function of attempting to scale back tooth decay.

Fluoridation Foyer Is Doubling Down

Sadly, in response to the abundance of latest analysis, the landmark lawsuit, rising concern within the scientific group and the sustained advocacy and training efforts of FAN, the promoters of fluoridation have doubled-down on their efforts to increase the observe additional in an effort to gaslight public officers into believing the observe isn’t getting ready to extinction.

The UK and New Zealand32 are each being threatened with nationwide fluoridation mandates. Within the U.Okay., the fluoridation foyer alongside the well being secretary, Matt Hancock, are urging the federal government to take the ability33 over fluoridation from native councils so he can mandate it all through the nation.

Whereas this risk may be very actual, the proposal doesn’t appear to have made a lot progress since March, however FAN is monitoring it and dealing with U.Okay. residents to mount opposition.

In New Zealand, the federal government has revived and amended a invoice that was launched in 2016 however lacked sufficient assist for passage. As launched, the invoice would have moved fluoridation selections from native councils — the place they reside presently – to district well being boards.

Nevertheless, the present authorities has amended the language to centralize fluoridation authority even additional, by giving full management34 to the director-general of well being, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield. Utilizing this course of has defied the conventional democratic course of, with no choose committee, group session or public enter.

Supporters of this proposal try to go it into legislation by the top of the yr, at which era native councils (and native taxpayers) might be accountable for all capital and operational prices. Whereas quite a lot of mayors have come out in opposition, in addition to residents and professionals led by Fluoride Free NZ,35 the proposal seems to be transferring ahead. Study extra in this new video from FAN.

The dental foyer can be concentrating on massive cities in North America. This previous summer time, a coalition led by Delta Dental labored behind the scenes to strain town council in Spokane, Washington, to go a decision to fluoridate their ingesting water, regardless of the general public voting thrice to reject fluoridation. A part of their gross sales pitch was that COVID was presenting an oral well being emergency, to which this could be an answer.

It was finally revealed that implementation would take a minimum of 5 years, making their exploitation of the pandemic to promote their fluoridation chemical compounds obvious. A neighborhood residents group assisted by FAN, Secure Water Spokane,36 has fought this effort, and in consequence the council has tabled their fluoridation decision and can examine the problem for the subsequent yr. Click here to study extra about Spokane.

Calgary, Alberta, can be being threated with fluoridation regardless of voting quite a few occasions to reject the observe. After listening to from the O’Brien Institute for Public Well being that the observe causes cognitive impairment,37 the cowardly council determined to place the problem to a public vote this October, slightly than decide. FAN is working with native campaigners Secure Water Calgary38 to make sure the general public votes “no” on reintroducing fluoridation chemical compounds.

The CDC has even partnered with non-public trade, utilizing your tax {dollars} to develop new fluoridation merchandise39 for rural water techniques and personal wells to increase the observe to each nook of the nation (and certain past).

We will’t depend on the mainstream media or the general public well being authorities to inform the general public or resolution makers about what is going on. It’s as much as us to make this info go viral! It’s as much as us to carry it to our elected leaders and demand motion! We’d like your assist greater than ever. Please assist us get to the ending line of a world with out fluoridation.